In Marriage of Casey O. In Marriage of Casey O.

In Marriage of Casey O‪.‬

116 CAL.RPTR.3D 375, 188 CAL.APP.4TH 1295, 2010 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 15,388, 10 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 12,765, 2010.CA.0007309

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Our system of justice presumes that court orders will be obeyed. When they are not, a litigant who ignores the orders can greatly frustrate the judge and other litigants. The frustration will be even greater in a family law matter where the emotional toll is frequently beyond the control of the litigants. This will cause the parties to act in ways that do not promote the resolution of the dispute and increase the cost, thus dissipating the estate, and maybe irreparably damage the relationship of the parties with their children. That is what occurred here. The only method available to bring a case such as this under control is to equalize the abilities of the parties to litigate the dispute and impose sanctions against the party who ignores court orders. That did not occur here.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2010
October 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
53
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
89.9
KB
Fleming v. Mcferson Fleming v. Mcferson
1933
Colorado State Board of Pharmacy v. Hallett. Colorado State Board of Pharmacy v. Hallett.
1931
Swab Financial v. E*Trade Securities Swab Financial v. E*Trade Securities
2007
J.T. v. Orourke J.T. v. Orourke
1982
Adolph Coors Co. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission Adolph Coors Co. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
1972
Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and Television Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and Television
2008