In Re Branch In Re Branch
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

PETERS, J. This petition involves petitioner's claim of inadequacy of his representation in that his counsel failed to investigate his claim that prior to or during the trial he had told his counsel that he had information that other named convicts had committed the offense with which he was charged. Based on the entire record, we find that petitioner did not tell his counsel of these facts prior to or during the trial, and that the information given the attorney just prior to sentence was given under such circumstances that the attorney reasonably believed the testimony would be perjured. We also find that the attorney acted reasonably in not further investigating the claimed facts, and that under the record, we should not find that petitioner is innocent.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1969
January 21
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
29
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
64.4
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of California In Bank

Union Oil Associates V. Johnson Union Oil Associates V. Johnson
1935
Wood v. Pendola Wood v. Pendola
1934
Tracy v. Contractors State License Board Tracy v. Contractors State License Board
1965
People v. Garcia People v. Garcia
1965
People V. Mccaughan People V. Mccaughan
1957
People v. One Harley-Davidson Motorcycle People v. One Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
1936