In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co. In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co.

In Re Chicago Rapid Transit Co‪.‬

1937.C07.40056 93 F.2D 832

Seventh Circuit Circuit Court of Appeals
    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The precise question before us may be stated thus -- Was the employment of Schuyler, Weinfeld & Hennessy by Commonwealth Edison (a large creditor and the owner of over half of debtors common stock) such as to require a court to veto Trustee Spragues request to employ them as his counsel?

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1937
November 10
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
63
KB

More Books by Seventh Circuit Circuit Court of Appeals

Consoer, Older & Quinlan Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Consoer, Older & Quinlan Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Consoer, Older & Quinlan Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1936
Dee v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. Dee v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.
Dee v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.
1936
Wm. J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. Ems Brewing Co. Wm. J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. Ems Brewing Co.
Wm. J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. Ems Brewing Co.
1947
Woods v. Fliss Woods v. Fliss
Woods v. Fliss
1948
Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co. Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co.
Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co.
1948
United States v. Chapman. United States v. Chapman.
United States v. Chapman.
1948