In Re Decker In Re Decker

In Re Decker

175 P.2D 204, 65 ARIZ. 122, 1946.AZ.40004

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Plaintiffs (now appellees) Le Roy S. Martin and Lettie H. Whitcomb, a single woman, filed suit against defendants (now appellants) E. E. Einboden and Dorothy J. Einboden, his wife, and Associated Mining and Milling Company of Nevada, a copartnership, to recover unpaid monthly payments in the aggregate sum of $2,000 allegedly due under the terms of a certain written lease and option agreement. The defendants filed an answer to the complaint together with a motion for summary judgment. This motion was predicated upon the theory that the agreement, above referred to, was an outright contract of sale and purchase of real property rather than a mere lease and option agreement. A hearing was had and on August 9, 1948, the court granted defendants motion for summary judgment resulting in a dismissal of plaintiffs complaint, although the record showed there was an issue of fact to be determined as to whether the unilateral option to purchase had been exercised.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1946
December 10
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
50.4
KB

More Books by Arizona Supreme Court

State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Schwab State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Schwab
1963
State v. Miranda State v. Miranda
1973
In Re One 1965 Ford Mustang In Re One 1965 Ford Mustang
1970
Modern Woodmen of America v. Stevens Modern Woodmen of America v. Stevens
1950
Miranda V. State Miranda V. State
1933
City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
1980