In Re P.D.M. In Re P.D.M.
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The primary issue we address in this appeal is whether the parental presumption applies when a court-ordered sole managing conservator (Mother) dies and the possessory conservator (Father) and a third party (Grandmother) both seek custody of the children. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.131 (Vernon 2002). The trial court granted a no-evidence summary judgment awarding Father custody of the children based on the parental presumption. We hold that Grandmother's and Father's suits are modification proceedings governed by family code chapter 156 and that, therefore, the parental presumption is not applicable. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's judgment and remand this case for trial.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
August 29
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
51
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
70.8
KB
Aviation Composite Technologies Aviation Composite Technologies
2004
Barnett v. State Barnett v. State
2006
Texas Dept of Family and Protective Services v. Atwood Texas Dept of Family and Protective Services v. Atwood
2004
Young v. Neatherlin Young v. Neatherlin
2003
Jackson V. State Jackson V. State
2004
In Re B.K.D. In Re B.K.D.
2003