In re Phillips In re Phillips

In re Phillips

260 Kan. 909, 925 P.2d 435, KS.0042269(1996)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This is an uncontested attorney discipline proceeding involving Daniel H. Phillips, of Wichita, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in the State of Kansas. Three complaints filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against respondent have been consolidated for purposes of this original proceeding in discipline. The complaints filed against respondent alleged that he violated MRPC 1.3 (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 257) (diligence), 1.4 (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 263) (communication), 1.5 (b) (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 268) (fees), 1.15 (a) and (b) (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 294) (safekeeping property), 1.16 (a) (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 300) (declining or terminating representation), 3.3 (a)(1) (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 311) (candor toward the tribunal), 4.1 (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 323) (truthfulness in statements to others), 8.4 (a), (b), (d), and (g) (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 340) (misconduct). The complaints were heard before a panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys on November 30, 1995. Based upon clear and convincing evidence, a unanimous panel made the following findings of facts and conclusions of law: CASE NO. B6011 Respondent was retained by Jody Kistner to defend her in a civil action in which it was alleged that Kistner owed plaintiff $13,500. Kistner paid respondent $700 to represent her. There was no

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
October 25
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
52.8
KB
State v. Smolin State v. Smolin
1976
Brown v. Wichita State University Brown v. Wichita State University
1975
Haz-Mat Response Haz-Mat Response
1996
Heiman v. Parrish Heiman v. Parrish
1997
Jones v. Kansas City Embalming & Casket Co. Jones v. Kansas City Embalming & Casket Co.
1962
J.C. Livestock Sales, Inc. v. Schoof J.C. Livestock Sales, Inc. v. Schoof
1971