J. J. Richter Et Al. v. J. C. Martin J. J. Richter Et Al. v. J. C. Martin

J. J. Richter Et Al. v. J. C. Martin

1960.TX.40737 337 S.W.2D 134

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

In our original opinion we stated that Section 15(d), Article 1269 l -3, Vernons Ann.Tex.Stats., empowered the Agency to issue bonds after a prior election. Actually, the Act authorizes the Agency to "issue bonds from time to time in its discretion to finance the undertaking of any urban renewal project * * *." The bonds "shall not be subject to the provisions of any other law relating to the authorization, issuance or sale of bonds." They "shall be authorized by resolution or ordinance of the governing body of the urban renewal agency * * *." The Act itself, therefore, does not require an election prior to the Agencys issuance of revenue bonds.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1960
June 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
58.4
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Texas

James Patterson Et Al v. Billie Barbara Hall Et Vir James Patterson Et Al v. Billie Barbara Hall Et Vir
1968
Danny Leon Bowers v. City Chattanooga Danny Leon Bowers v. City Chattanooga
1992
Jack Fowler v. Happy Goodman Family and Jack Fowler v. Happy Goodman Family and
1978
Mercantile National Bank at Dallas Mercantile National Bank at Dallas
1953
Adjudication Water Rights Upper Guadalupe Segment Guadalupe River Basin Adjudication Water Rights Upper Guadalupe Segment Guadalupe River Basin
1982
East Texas Theatres v. James C. Rutledge East Texas Theatres v. James C. Rutledge
1970