J. J. Richter Et Al. v. J. C. Martin
1960.TX.40737 337 S.W.2D 134
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
In our original opinion we stated that Section 15(d), Article 1269 l -3, Vernons Ann.Tex.Stats., empowered the Agency to issue bonds after a prior election. Actually, the Act authorizes the Agency to "issue bonds from time to time in its discretion to finance the undertaking of any urban renewal project * * *." The bonds "shall not be subject to the provisions of any other law relating to the authorization, issuance or sale of bonds." They "shall be authorized by resolution or ordinance of the governing body of the urban renewal agency * * *." The Act itself, therefore, does not require an election prior to the Agencys issuance of revenue bonds.
More Books by Supreme Court of Texas
James Patterson Et Al v. Billie Barbara Hall Et Vir
1968
Danny Leon Bowers v. City Chattanooga
1992
Jack Fowler v. Happy Goodman Family and
1978
Mercantile National Bank at Dallas
1953
Adjudication Water Rights Upper Guadalupe Segment Guadalupe River Basin
1982
East Texas Theatres v. James C. Rutledge
1970