“The People vs Muhammad” book is based on ordinary argument which have false premises. Her book is not based on Valid argument nor Sound argument. One of my friends said that J.K Sheindlin's strategy could be used and it could be done any way he wanted. Putting Muhammad (PBUH) on trial or Putting Jesus (PBUH) on trial - Is this really good to hear?. Suppose someone criticizes a prophet, are he or she really worthy of that?
The fact is those who complain and claim are not professionals in mental health and doubt whether they have studied neuroscience and mental health at the university level!