![Jack Cohen v. First National City Bank](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jack Cohen v. First National City Bank](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jack Cohen v. First National City Bank
NY.40196; 418 N.E.2d 672; 52 N.Y.2d 863 (1981)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Opinion OF THE COURT On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]). Indeed, as we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 N.Y.2d 594, 600-601), it would have constituted an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.