Jack Sorkin & Marvin Ginsburg v. City St. Jack Sorkin & Marvin Ginsburg v. City St.

Jack Sorkin & Marvin Ginsburg v. City St‪.‬

MO.1784 , 800 S.W.2d 817 (1990)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Plaintiffs, Jack Sorkin and Marvin Ginsburg, d/b/a Sorkin, Ginsburg and Associates, appeal from order of summary judgment entered in favor of the City of St. Clair, Missouri. In their points relied upon, plaintiffs allege the trial court committed error in granting summary judgment because: (1) their first amended petition stated a cause of action enforceable under § 432.070 RSMo 1986; and (2) the issue of whether the contract in question was signed by the appropriate agent of St. Clair is a question of fact which requires the court to hear evidence. We affirm. Section 432.070 governs the form of contracts executed by cities such as St. Clair. It requires all contracts to be expressly authorized by law, in writing, dated when made and signed by the parties or their agents. Section 432.070 RSMo 1986.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1990
December 26
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
4
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
63.8
KB

More Books by Court of Appeals of Missouri

Village Cottleville v. Star Concrete Village Cottleville v. Star Concrete
1988
Robert and Pearl Conroy v. City Ballwin Robert and Pearl Conroy v. City Ballwin
1986
State Missouri v. Jeffrey Wade Schmidt State Missouri v. Jeffrey Wade Schmidt
1993
State Missouri v. Terrence Metts State Missouri v. Terrence Metts
1992
Elizabeth Ann Boudreau Elizabeth Ann Boudreau
1992
H.W.S. and J.C.S. v. C. T H.W.S. and J.C.S. v. C. T
1992