Jacobsen v. Osborne
133 F.3D 315, 1998.C05.43350 , 39 FED.R.SERV.3D 1291
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Primarily at issue is whether, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c)(3), a proposed amendment to a complaint to add new parties relates back to the date of the original complaint, especially for replacing "John Doe" defendants, thereby defeating a limitations bar as to those putative parties. For his action seeking relief under, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Michael Jacobsen appeals the denial of his motion to amend in order to substitute the correct defendants (police officers and sheriffs deputies) for an erroneously named officer and a "John Doe" deputy. We AFFIRM as to the deputies; REVERSE as to the officers; and REMAND.
Battle v. Memorial Hospital At Gulfport
2000
Rizzo v. Children's World Learning Centers
1999
Kee v. City of Rowlett Texas
2001
United States V. Abrego
1998
Martin''s Herend Imports Inc. v. Diamond & Gem Trading usa
1997
Cajun Electric Power Cooperative Inc. v. Cajun Electric Power Cooperative Inc.
1997