![James Henry v. United States America](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![James Henry v. United States America](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
James Henry v. United States America
C09.178 , 361 F.2d 352 (1966)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
BARNES, Circuit Judge. Appellant Henry, jointly with the defendant Fuller, was charged with and convicted of knowingly receiving and possessing twenty-two packages of pressure regulators which had been stolen from an interstate shipment of goods. (18 U.S.C. § 659.) Error is claimed in five particulars: (1) the insufficiency of the evidence that appellant knew the goods had been stolen; (2) that the trial judge coerced the verdict; (3) that the appellant was required to defend his innocence as to other stolen items; (4) that a new trial should have been granted upon the ground of newly discovered evidence; and (5) that there was prejudicial misconduct by the United States Attorney in his summarization to the jury.
More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bear Gulch Water Co. v. Commissioner
1941
Betsy Ross
1944
Republic Of Philippines V. Marcos
1988
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes fort Peck Indian Reservation v. Board Oil and Gas Conservation State Montana
1986
Church of Scientology of California v. United States
1990
Anheuser-Busch Inc. V. Natural Beverage Distributors
1995