![James L. Kessler v. Old Guard Mutual Insurance Company and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![James L. Kessler v. Old Guard Mutual Insurance Company and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
James L. Kessler v. Old Guard Mutual Insurance Company and Harleysville Mutual Insurance Co.
1990.PA.40725; 570 A.2D 569, 391 PA. SUPER. 175
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
The issue in this appeal is whether insureds who have recovered a final judgment against their fire insurance carriers can refuse to satisfy the judgment unless the carriers pay them pre-judgment and post-judgment interest in addition to the amount of the judgment. This issue was submitted to the trial court in a separate action for declaratory judgment and was decided in favor of the insureds. We hold that the plaintiff insureds could properly require the insurer-defendants to pay post-judgment interest from the date of the verdict but that the plaintiffs could not refuse to satisfy the judgment merely because the insurers did not tender pre-judgment interest.