James M. Sprouse v. Clay Communication James M. Sprouse v. Clay Communication

James M. Sprouse v. Clay Communication

1975.WV.88, 211 S.E.2D 674, 158 W.VA. 427

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

A candidate for political office is governed by the same rules with regard to recovery for libel as a public official and can sustain an action for libel only if he can prove that: (1) the alleged libelous statements were false or misleading; (2) the statements tended to defame the plaintiff and reflect shame, contumely, and disgrace upon him; (3) the statements were published with knowledge at the time of publication that they were false or misleading or were published with a reckless and willful disregard of truth; and, (4) the publisher intended to injure the plaintiff through the knowing or reckless publication of the alleged libelous material.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1975
February 4
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
68
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
96.8
KB

More Books by Fourth Circuit U.S. Court Of Appeals

[U] Christian Science Board of Directors of the First Church of Christ Scientist v. Robinson [U] Christian Science Board of Directors of the First Church of Christ Scientist v. Robinson
2001
Hampton Audio Electronics, Inc. v. Contel Cellular, Inc. Hampton Audio Electronics, Inc. v. Contel Cellular, Inc.
1994
Cooper v. Smith & Nephew Cooper v. Smith & Nephew
2001
[U] Turner v. United States Department of Agriculture [U] Turner v. United States Department of Agriculture
2000
[U] Cruzado-Goicochea v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service [U] Cruzado-Goicochea v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
1999
Razzaq v. Old Dominion University Razzaq v. Old Dominion University
1999