![Jane and Marcello Festa v. Steven J. Greenberg](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jane and Marcello Festa v. Steven J. Greenberg](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jane and Marcello Festa v. Steven J. Greenberg
1986.PA.42818 511 A.2D 1371, 354 PA. SUPER. 346
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
"Appellees initiated this action against appellant-physician asserting that the surgery he performed upon appellee-wife was done in a negligent manner and without proper consent. The trial court originally entered a compulsory non-suit in appellant-physicians favor because appellees failed to introduce expert testimony to support either of their claims. Subsequently, the trial court granted appellees motions to remove non-suit and for a new trial stating that expert testimony is not required to establish a physicians duty to disclose information in informed consent cases. This timely appeal followed.