Jane Doe Et Al. v. Calumet City Et Al. Jane Doe Et Al. v. Calumet City Et Al.

Jane Doe Et Al. v. Calumet City Et Al‪.‬

IL.6550 , 641 N.E.2d 498, 161 Ill. 2d 374, Dec. 274 (1994)(204 Ill)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

JUSTICE NICKELS delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal reviews whether plaintiffs have stated acause of action against defendant police officers and their respective
municipalities for conduct while responding to a police call. Plaintiffs are Jane Doe (Jane) and her two minor children, Betty
and John. Defendants on appeal are Calumet City and its officers James Horka, Daniel Surufka and Kevin Beasley; and the Village
of Burnham and its officer Gregory Giglio. An additional defendant, Ben Valentine, is not a subject of this appeal.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1994
August 4
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
36
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
77.6
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Illinois

People v. One 1979 Pontiac Grand Prix People v. One 1979 Pontiac Grand Prix
1982
People v. Gacy People v. Gacy
1984
Ill. Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. Block Ill. Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n v. Block
1979
The People v. Hampton The People v. Hampton
1969
People Ex Rel. Myers v. Briggs People Ex Rel. Myers v. Briggs
1970
The People v. Dewey The People v. Dewey
1969