![Jane Doe Et Al. v. Calumet City Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jane Doe Et Al. v. Calumet City Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jane Doe Et Al. v. Calumet City Et Al.
IL.6550 , 641 N.E.2d 498, 161 Ill. 2d 374, Dec. 274 (1994)(204 Ill)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
JUSTICE NICKELS delivered the opinion of the court: This appeal reviews whether plaintiffs have stated acause of action against defendant police officers and their respective
municipalities for conduct while responding to a police call. Plaintiffs are Jane Doe (Jane) and her two minor children, Betty
and John. Defendants on appeal are Calumet City and its officers James Horka, Daniel Surufka and Kevin Beasley; and the Village
of Burnham and its officer Gregory Giglio. An additional defendant, Ben Valentine, is not a subject of this appeal.