Jane Doe v. Shirlene Hafen Jane Doe v. Shirlene Hafen

Jane Doe v. Shirlene Hafen

1989.UT.79, 772 P.2D 456, 106 UTAH ADV. REP. 31

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

HELD. - The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to ask wide-ranging voir dire questions. General objection to failure to ask the questions was insufficient to preserve possibly meritorious question for review. Voir dire concerning possible prejudice from "tort reform propaganda" was not warranted. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the aged widow of defendant to sit at the counsel table and assist in voir dire. Evidence of Does miscarriage and voluntary sterilization were properly admitted in relation to her mental symptoms.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1989
April 7
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
60.3
KB

More Books by Department Two Supreme Court of Washington

Weiss v. Weiss Weiss v. Weiss
1969
Richard Barry Hurley v. Board Review Richard Barry Hurley v. Board Review
1988
Black Ball Freight Service Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission Black Ball Freight Service Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
1968
In Re Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Of Charles A. Mcnear In Re Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Of Charles A. Mcnear
1965
American Smelting and Refining Co. v. Whatcom County American Smelting and Refining Co. v. Whatcom County
1942
Cook Cook
1968