Jang v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
80 CAL.APP.4TH 1291, 80 CAL.APP.4TH 1291, 95 CAL.RPTR.2D 917, 95 CAL.RPTR.2D 917, 2000.CA.0042405 , 00 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 4110, 00 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 4110
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
In this matter we conclude a party who is absent at the time of a search of his home nevertheless has a sufficient privacy interest in the premises to assert a knock-notice violation. However, we also conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the police officers executing a search warrant on defendants home substantially complied with the knock-notice requirements of Penal Code section 1531 despite failing to wait a sufficient time before entering to permit any occupant therein to respond. Consequently, the search was not unreasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.
More Books by California Court of Appeals
Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County
2000
Frase v. Gourley
2000
Department Of Children And Family Services
2002
Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors
2001
Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction
2002
Paterno V. State
1999