![Jansen v. Southern Pacific Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jansen v. Southern Pacific Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jansen v. Southern Pacific Co.
1952.CA.40364; 112 CAL. APP. 2D 833; 247 P.2D 581
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Following the filing of the original opinion of this court defendant company petitioned for a rehearing, which was granted. The contentions of appellant in support thereof are that the court "omitted from and/or incorrectly stated" material facts in the opinion, and that there was a failure to "specifically consider" certain issues raised. Counsel then concludes the petition with a statement that this court by its opinion has accomplished a reversal "of existing principles of law" by placing a "directly contrary construction upon the holdings of a multitude of cases." We shall consider the contentions of appellant as enumerated. However