Jarrett v. Woodward Bros. Jarrett v. Woodward Bros.

Jarrett v. Woodward Bros‪.‬

751 A.2D 972, 751 A.2D 972, 2000.DC.0042096

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Petitioner Dorothy Miller seeks review of an order of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (the "BZA") that granted a special exception allowing the intervenor, Allstate Hotel Partnership ("Allstate"), to build a hotel within the Special Purpose District near her residence. Miller contends that the BZAs conclusions of law do not flow rationally from its findings, that the BZAs decision to permit construction of the hotel contravenes the pertinent zoning regulations, and that the decision is premised on a regulatory interpretation that is inconsistent with the interpretation that the BZA announced in a previous case. Miller also asserts that the BZA failed to consider pertinent policies established by the Districts Comprehensive Plan. We affirm the BZAs decision.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
May 25
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
42
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
74.8
KB

More Books by District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Mcdermett v. United States Mcdermett v. United States
1953
Nash v. District Columbia Nash v. District Columbia
1946
Tindle v. United States Tindle v. United States
2001
Bell v. Westbrook Bell v. Westbrook
1946
In re S.L.E In re S.L.E
1996
Council of District of Columbia v. Clay Council of District of Columbia v. Clay
1996