Jarvis V. Cory Jarvis V. Cory

Jarvis V. Cory

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

In these consolidated cases petitioners Jarvis and Brodty seek writs of mandate declaring a salary appropriation bill unconstitutional and ordering respondent State Controller (Cory) to refrain from expending any funds pursuant to the bill. We must decide whether Senate Bill No. 91, 1979 Regular Session (SB 91), which awards a lump sum payment to certain state employees based on work already performed, violates provisions of the California Constitution that preclude the Legislature from enacting retroactive "extra compensation" for state employees (art. IV, § 17) and from sending an appropriation that augments a future budget act to the Governor before that act takes effect (art. IV, § 12, subd. (c)).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1980
December 18
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
37
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
70
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of California

Watchtower Bible And Tract Society Inc. V. County Of Los Angeles Watchtower Bible And Tract Society Inc. V. County Of Los Angeles
1947
Bakke V. Regents Of University Of California Bakke V. Regents Of University Of California
1976
People V. Ramirez People V. Ramirez
1990
Building Material & Construction Teamsters' Union V. Farrell Building Material & Construction Teamsters' Union V. Farrell
1986
People V. Sirhan People V. Sirhan
1972
Demain V. State Bar Of California Demain V. State Bar Of California
1970