![Jay Township Authority v. Cummins](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jay Township Authority v. Cummins](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jay Township Authority v. Cummins
773 A.2D 828, 2001.PA.0000340
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Robert Cummins (d/b/a Bob Cummins Construction Co.) and Mid-State Surety Corp. appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of the 59th Judicial District (Elk County Branch), which awarded the Jay Township Authority (Authority) $10,760.00, the amount of Cummins bid bond. The issue presented for review is whether the Authority properly awarded a project contract to Cummins thereby entitling it to the bid security when Cummins subsequently failed to execute the contract documents.
More Books by Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
ABF Freight Systems, Inc. v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board
2000
Department of Corrections, State Correctional Institution at Chester v. State Civil Service Commission
2003
Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.
1984
City Of Butler V. City Of Butler Police Dept.
2001
Durkin & Sons v. Department of Transportation
1999
Tire Jockey Service, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Protection
2003