![Jeffrey Schwartz v. New York State Thruway Authority](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Jeffrey Schwartz v. New York State Thruway Authority](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Jeffrey Schwartz v. New York State Thruway Authority
NY.43511; 463 N.E.2d 612; 61 N.Y.2d 955 (1987)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
The guiderail that was installed met the relevant design standards in effect at the time of its construction. Claimant asserts
that it should have been extended an additional 11.