Jenney Et Al. v. Hynes Et Al. Jenney Et Al. v. Hynes Et Al.

Jenney Et Al. v. Hynes Et Al‪.‬

MA.71 , 184 N.E. 444, 182 (1933)(282 Mass)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

CROSBY, Justice. This bill in equity is brought by the owners of land on the corner of Commonwealth Avenue and Deerfield Street, in Boston, against the owner and the lessee of land on the corner of Commonwealth Avenue and Sherborn Street, to enforce certain equitable restrictions. A final decree has been entered in favor of the plaintiffs from which the defendants appealed. The case was referred to a master. The defendants' objections to his report were overruled and an interlocutory decree was entered confirming it and denying a motion for recommittal. With the exception of part of the testimony of two witnesses, the evidence is not reported. The question for decision is whether the final decree is warranted upon the facts found and those agreed to by the parties. A plan dated January 9, 1894, was introduced in evidence marked exhibit three. The estates of the plaintiffs and defendants are both on the Commonwealth Avenue side of block C, the plaintiffs' estate being marked on the plan 'Lot H' 'Reserved For Sale,' and the defendants' estate being lots twenty-two and twenty-three. All the lots in block C except the plaintiffs' are subject to certain restrictions established in 1896 to remain in force until January 1, 1950, for the benefit of all the land in that block including the defendants' land. It appeared that there were 'two sets of restrictions, one expiring in 1930 and one expiring in 1950,' and that 'they were the same restrictions only covering a wider area.' These restrictions prohibit the erection, placing or use on said land of any buildings other than dwelling houses or outbuildings to dwelling houses, the erection of stables of any kind and the use of any building as an apartment house, family hotel, or flats, and prohibit in design or construction any building to be fitted for occupancy by more than one family, or to be used for manufacturing, mercantile, or mechanical purposes.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1933
February 21
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
16
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
69.3
KB

More Books by Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Spilios v. Papps Et Al. Spilios v. Papps Et Al.
1934
Kidder v. Mayor Cambridge Et Al. Cabral Et Kidder v. Mayor Cambridge Et Al. Cabral Et
1939
Jessica Sorensen v. Paul Sorensen Jessica Sorensen v. Paul Sorensen
1975
Commonwealth v. George A. Schnopps Commonwealth v. George A. Schnopps
1981
Priscilla D. Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room Priscilla D. Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room
1964
Daniel Scott Corder v. State Indiana Daniel Scott Corder v. State Indiana
1984