John L. Mcmahon v. John J. Christmann Et Al‪.‬

To the extent that it opposes the distinction now drawn between mineral leases and deeds for purposes of the Duhig rule, I agree with Justice Smiths concurring opinion. He may well be correct also in saying that the theory of the instant decision runs counter to that of Benge v. Scharbauer, 152 Tex. 447, 259 S.W.2d 166, although this does not greatly disturb me. However, and contrary to his opinion, I think the Duhig