Love v. State

Lynda Lee Love [""Love""] appeals her judgment and sentence and the denial of her post-conviction motion to withdraw her plea. We find no error and affirm. Love first complains that the competency hearing held by the trial court prior to entry of her plea was inadequate. We find no merit to this claim of error. There was no objection to the proceeding and no reservation of the right to appeal this issue. She had been examined within the preceding month by two psychiatrists and, given that both reports showed she was competent, both counsel agreed the court could rule based on the reports.