Makinson v. Industrial Commission Makinson v. Industrial Commission

Makinson v. Industrial Commission

655 P.2D 366, 134 ARIZ. 246, 1982.AZ.40132

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The appellants, Edmund A. Vikse and Edna M. Vikse, husband and wife, and Sigurd A. Miland, obtained a judgment against the appellees Joe S. Agers and W. Shelley Richey and others in the state court in Minnesota. The judgment was affirmed by the Minnesota Supreme Court and is reported as Vikse v. Flaby, 316 N.W.2d 276 (1982). The basis of the judgment was land fraud and jurisdiction was obtained via the Minnesota long arm statute, since the appellees were and are residents of Arizona. The Miland judgment was for $41,530.96. Vikses was in the amount of $29,071.67. Both were principal amounts only.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1982
September 30
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
61.4
KB

More Books by Arizona Court of Appeals

Timmerman v. U.S. Bank Timmerman v. U.S. Bank
2007
Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency
2007
Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission
2006
Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld
1995
M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc. M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc.
1990
Bell V. State Bell V. State
1984