Malloy Et Al. v. Carroll Et Al. Malloy Et Al. v. Carroll Et Al.

Malloy Et Al. v. Carroll Et Al‪.‬

1934.MA.285, 191 N.E. 661, 287 MASS. 376

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

DONAHUE, Justice. The plaintiffs brought a bill in equity in the superior court to establish and secure their rights as members of the Boston Cement and Asphalt Finishers Union Local No. 534, a voluntary association hereinafter referred to as the union. The defendants as described in the bill are (a) four named persons and other persons too numerous to be mentioned, purporting to be officers and members of that union; (b) four named persons individually and as they officers and members of the Building Trades Council of Boston and Vicinity, a voluntary association the members of which are too numerous to be set forth herein and (c) three named persons individually and as they are officers and members of the Operative Plasterers and Cement Finishers International Association of the United States and Canada. An answer was filed by the four persons named in the first group of defendants for themselves and in behalf of the officers and members of the union; by the United Building Trades Council of Boston and Vicinity and by the Operative Plasterers & Cement Finishers International Association of the United States and Canada. The case was referred to a master and after the confirmation of his report a Judge of the superior court made an order for the entry of a final decree which provided that the defendants be restrained from interfering with the plaintiffs in the enjoyment of their rights and privileges as members of the union and reported the case to this court upon a stipulation that, if he was warranted in ordering the entry of such a decree, that decree should be entered; otherwise a decree was to be entered dismissing the bill. The rescript from this court was Decree to be entered as ordered. See Malloy v. Carroll, 272 Mass. 524, 172 N.E. 790.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1934
July 6
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
21
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
70.3
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. David Lewis Hoskins State v. David Lewis Hoskins
1972
Melinda Loveless v. State Indiana Melinda Loveless v. State Indiana
1994
Patuxent Institution Board Review v. Clarence J. Hancock Patuxent Institution Board Review v. Clarence J. Hancock
1993
State Minnesota v. Kevin George Lodermeier State Minnesota v. Kevin George Lodermeier
1995
Matter Petition Peoples Natural Gas Matter Petition Peoples Natural Gas
1985
State Minnesota v. Paul Arthur Wilson State Minnesota v. Paul Arthur Wilson
1995