Malone v. Equitas Reinsurance Limited Malone v. Equitas Reinsurance Limited

Malone v. Equitas Reinsurance Limited

84 Cal.App.4th 1430, 84 Cal.App.4th 1430, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 524, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 524, CA.0042887(2000)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kurt J. Lewin, Judge. Affirmed. This case is just one of many in which individual underwriters at Lloyd's of London have sued English entities in the United States based on events that occurred in England. The trial court dismissed the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. We conclude that defendants did not have the requisite contacts with the State of California and affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
November 2
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
15
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
72.4
KB

More Books by California Court of Appeals

Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County
2000
Frase v. Gourley Frase v. Gourley
2000
Department Of Children And Family Services Department Of Children And Family Services
2002
Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors
2001
Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction
2002
Paterno V. State Paterno V. State
1999