Malone V. State
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
The court of appeals held that the corroborating, non-covert agent evidence at James Malone's trial did not sufficiently "tend to connect" Malone to the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver under the rule governing testimony from a covert agent, Article 38.141 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.*fn1 We hold that the corroborating evidence is sufficient and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.