Mathis v. Lockwood Mathis v. Lockwood

Mathis v. Lockwood

166 S.W.3d 743, 48 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 895, 2005.TX.0004278

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Mary Mathis, appearing pro se, appeals the trial courts refusal to set aside a post-answer default judgment against her. The court of appeals affirmed, holding Mathis failed to overcome a presumption that she received notice of the trial setting. 132 S.W.3d 629, 632. Finding neither presumption nor evidence to support this conclusion, we reverse and remand to the trial court for a new trial.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2005
June 17
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
55.3
KB
King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman
2003
Village of Pheasant Run Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Kastor Village of Pheasant Run Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Kastor
2001
Central Ready Mix Concrete Co. Central Ready Mix Concrete Co.
2007
Fidelity And Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co. Fidelity And Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.
2006
In Re Mays-Hooper In Re Mays-Hooper
2006
Flour Bluff Independent School District v. Bass Flour Bluff Independent School District v. Bass
2004