Michael J. Weatherford v. State Indiana

The issues raised by appellant have been combined as follows: (1) whether the Honorable Vincent Grogg had jurisdiction to decide appellants post-conviction claim; and (2) whether the issues presented in appellants petition for post-conviction relief have been waived, consisting of four subparts: (a) whether fundamental error occurred at trial; (b) whether the Honorable Vincent Grogg erred by not specifically identifying the alleged fundamental error in his findings; (c) whether the summary denial of appellants petition for post-conviction relief deprived him of his right to appeal; and (d) whether uncorrected error of law occurred at trial which requires reversal of his conviction.