Morales v. Reynolds Morales v. Reynolds

Morales v. Reynolds

97 P.3D 612, 136 N.M. 280, 2004-NMCA-098, 2004.NM.0000096

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

1 The two cases on appeal here present an opportunity to examine the standard announced in Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc., 2001-NMSC-034, 131 N.M. 272, 34 P.3d 1148, which expanded the set of circumstances under which a worker may pursue an independent tort action outside of the exclusivity provision of the Workers Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, § 52-1-9 (1973). We hold that neither of these cases meets the requirements of the test set forth in Delgado, 2001-NMSC-034, 26. We consolidate the cases and affirm both district court decisions in favor of Defendants.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
June 10
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
65.1
KB
State v. Franco State v. Franco
2005
Healthsource Healthsource
2005
Gray v. Oklahoma Tax Commission Gray v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
1963
Division of Youth and Family Services v. G.M. Division of Youth and Family Services v. G.M.
2008
Yellow Book of New York, Inc. v. Midtown Karate Dojo, Inc. Yellow Book of New York, Inc. v. Midtown Karate Dojo, Inc.
2006
Rasbury v. State Rasbury v. State
1956
Mannick v. Wakeland Mannick v. Wakeland
2004
Brown V. Anderson Brown V. Anderson
2003
Weiss v. Weiss Weiss v. Weiss
1969
State V. Heirs Of Kapahi State V. Heirs Of Kapahi
1964
Fleming v. Mcferson Fleming v. Mcferson
1933
Consoer, Older & Quinlan Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Consoer, Older & Quinlan Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1936