Morganroth & Morganroth v. Delorean Morganroth & Morganroth v. Delorean

Morganroth & Morganroth v. Delorean

213 F.3D 1301, 213 F.3D 1301, 2000.C10.0042709

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Plaintiffs/appellees Mayer Morganroth and his law firm, Morganroth and Morganroth (hereafter Morganroth), filed this diversity suit to set aside a transfer of property as fraudulent. Morganroth pleaded three theories for relief, but the only one which is relevant to this appeal is the theory that the transfer of the property should be set aside under Utah Code Ann. § 25-6-6(1) (1998). That statute deems a transfer fraudulent without requiring proof of actual intent to defraud when the transfer is not made for a reasonably equivalent value; the transferor is either insolvent at the time or rendered insolvent by the transfer; and the creditors claim arose before the transfer.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
June 5
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
38
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
77.9
KB

More Books by Arizona Court of Appeals

Timmerman v. U.S. Bank Timmerman v. U.S. Bank
2007
Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency
2007
Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission
2006
Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld
1995
M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc. M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc.
1990
Bell V. State Bell V. State
1984