Ohio v. Robinette Ohio v. Robinette

Ohio v. Robinette

519 U.S. 33, 117 S.CT. 417, 1996.SCT.0000202

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

We are here presented with the question whether the Fourth Amendment requires that a lawfully seized defendant must be advised that he is "free to go" before his consent to search will be recognized as voluntary. We hold that it does not.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
November 18
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
25
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
64.6
KB
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona
1966
Giles Et Al. v. Maryland Giles Et Al. v. Maryland
1967
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
1967
Napue v. Illinois Napue v. Illinois
1959