Ohio v. Robinette
519 U.S. 33, 117 S.CT. 417, 1996.SCT.0000202
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
We are here presented with the question whether the Fourth Amendment requires that a lawfully seized defendant must be advised that he is "free to go" before his consent to search will be recognized as voluntary. We hold that it does not.