People v. Murray People v. Murray

People v. Murray

912 P.2d 554, 1996.CO.40937

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Original Proceeding in Discipline EN BANC A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be publicly censured, that he make certain restitution, and be assessed the costs of the proceeding. The assistant disciplinary counsel has excepted to the panel's recommendation as too lenient, and the respondent has not filed an answer brief. We agree with the assistant disciplinary counsel that the respondent's misconduct warrants a period of suspension. We therefore order that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days, be required to make certain restitution prior to reinstatement, and be assessed costs. I.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1996
March 11
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
5
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
52.2
KB
Fleming v. Mcferson Fleming v. Mcferson
1933
Swab Financial v. E*Trade Securities Swab Financial v. E*Trade Securities
2007
Colorado State Board of Pharmacy v. Hallett. Colorado State Board of Pharmacy v. Hallett.
1931
Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and Television Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and Television
2008
People v. Selga People v. Selga
2008
J.T. v. Orourke J.T. v. Orourke
1982