Piercing the Veil of Corporate Secrecy About Clinical Trials (Essay) Piercing the Veil of Corporate Secrecy About Clinical Trials (Essay)

Piercing the Veil of Corporate Secrecy About Clinical Trials (Essay‪)‬

The Hastings Center Report 2004, Sept-Oct, 34, 5

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

In the last three decades, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry has burgeoned into one of the most profitable industries. With profit has come power. Backed by unprecedented financial means and pressured by stockholders' demand for investment returns, pharmaceutical companies have taken a much Larger stake in all stages of medical research. Corporate contributions to research and development in academia have risen by 875 percent between 1980 and 2000. (1) Over this time, the industry has extended its influence into all aspects of the process of creating and regulating scientific knowledge and health care products. As a result, ever more of those involved in research now have financial relationships with the industry. Academic researchers may top off their salaries with stock options or fees for consultations, speaking arrangements, and membership on advisory boards of pharmaceutical companies. Financial rewards are also offered to consumer and advocacy groups, primary care physicians, research recruiters, bioethics consultants and centers, and scientists at the National Institutes of Health. (2) And while financial compensation may be inappropriate for those directly involved in the federal drug approval process, industry can offer these officials wall-paying jobs when they leave their positions. In addition, being on a company's payroll has not prevented experts from functioning as members of governmental advisory panels that approve new drugs and evaluate clinical practice guidelines.

GENRE
Science & Nature
RELEASED
2004
September 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
Hastings Center
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
168.8
KB
Trials and Tribulations. Trials and Tribulations.
2008
Human Research Protections: Time for Regulatory Reform?(Essays) Human Research Protections: Time for Regulatory Reform?(Essays)
2008
Reporting Bias in Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies: Time for Action (Editorial) Reporting Bias in Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies: Time for Action (Editorial)
2008
Fostering Integrity in Research Fostering Integrity in Research
2017
The Curious Case of Off-Label Use (At Law) The Curious Case of Off-Label Use (At Law)
2007
Regenerative Medicine Ethics Regenerative Medicine Ethics
2013
Confronting Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: My Father's Death (Essays) Confronting Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: My Father's Death (Essays)
2008
Access to Health-Related Goods (Bioethics & Human Rights) Access to Health-Related Goods (Bioethics & Human Rights)
2009
"Are Their Babies Different from Ours?" Dutch Culture and the Groningen Protocol (Letters) "Are Their Babies Different from Ours?" Dutch Culture and the Groningen Protocol (Letters)
2008
Rethinking the Ethics of Vital Organ Donations: Accepted Medical Practice Already Violates the Dead Donor Rule. Explicitly Jettisoning the Rule--Allowing Vital Organs to Be Extracted, Under Certain Conditions, From Living Patients--Is a Radical Change Only at the Conceptual Level. But It Would Expand the Pools of Eligible Organ Donors. Rethinking the Ethics of Vital Organ Donations: Accepted Medical Practice Already Violates the Dead Donor Rule. Explicitly Jettisoning the Rule--Allowing Vital Organs to Be Extracted, Under Certain Conditions, From Living Patients--Is a Radical Change Only at the Conceptual Level. But It Would Expand the Pools of Eligible Organ Donors.
2008
Gender Identity Disorder in Childhood: Inconclusive Advice to Parents (Essay) Gender Identity Disorder in Childhood: Inconclusive Advice to Parents (Essay)
2009
A Not-So-New Eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement. A Not-So-New Eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement.
2011