Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Yingling Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Yingling

Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Yingling

226 F.3d 668, 2000 Fed.App. 0311, 2000 Fed.App. 0311, C06.0042312(2000)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 00a0311p.06 Submitted: June 13, 2000 OPINION Prudential Securities, Inc. (""Prudential"") and Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (""Dean Witter"") (collectively referred to as ""plaintiffs"") initiated this action seeking to enjoin Catherine M. Yingling (""Yingling"" or ""defendant"") from pursuing claims against them in a National Association of Security Dealers (""NASD"") arbitration proceeding. The district court permanently enjoined Yingling from pursuing arbitration claims which accrued prior to September 2, 1991, concluding that pursuant to § 10304 of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure, such claims were time barred. Plaintiffs then moved for the dismissal of defendant's counter claims and the district court granted the motion. Defendant brought this pro se appeal.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2000
September 11
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
66.5
KB

More Books by Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Associated General Contractors of Ohio, Inc. v. Drabik Associated General Contractors of Ohio, Inc. v. Drabik
2000
Foundation For Interior Design Education Research V. Savannah College Of Art & Design Foundation For Interior Design Education Research V. Savannah College Of Art & Design
2001
Medical Billing, Inc. v. Medical Management Sciences Medical Billing, Inc. v. Medical Management Sciences
2000
Dobbs-Weinstein V. Vanderbilt University Dobbs-Weinstein V. Vanderbilt University
1999
United States V. Boucha United States V. Boucha
2001
Gulertekin V. Tinnelman-Cooper Gulertekin V. Tinnelman-Cooper
2003