Questions on the Independence and Reliability of Cochrane Reviews, With a Focus on Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine.
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 2006, Winter, 11, 4
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
ABSTRACT The Oxford University-based Cochrane Collaboration had previously been dependent on British government funding. A change in funding completed by 2004 appears to leave Cochrane now more vulnerable to undue influence from commercial and government funding sources. Cochrane's 2005 published policies on commercial conflicts of interest do not address and appear ineffective to prevent conflicts over government funding and undue political interference.
More Books Like This
New Perspectives on Risk Communication
2013
Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies
2012
Testimony on the Influence of Private Foundations on Public Policy (From the Archives)
2010
Healthcare Antitrust, Settlements, and the Federal Trade Commission
2018
Food, Science, Policy and Regulation in the Twentieth Century
2013
Human Rights and Emerging Technologies
2018
More Books by Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons
"Obamacare": What Is in It (Barack Obama's Health Care Reform)
2010
Extrathyroidal Benefits of Iodine.
2006
Lessons from Sweden's Universal Health System: Tales from the Health-Care Crypt.
2008
The Need for Clinical Judgment in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease (Report)
2009
Selective Serotonin: Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Drugs: More Risks Than Benefits?(Report)
2009
Obamacare Policy Myths: Warnings from a 1980S HMO Executive (Essay)
2010