Ragasa v. Fred Lau Hawaiian Landscape Company
197 P.3D 787, 119 HAWAII 335, 2008.HI.0000792
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Descripción editorial
On appeal, Ragasa contends that Findings of Fact Nos. 8, 16, 17, 21, 22, and 23 are clearly erroneous. Ragasa also challenges the conclusion of law that holds he did not fall within the odd-lot category and is therefore not permanently and totally disabled.