![Railroad Commission Texas Et Al. v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Railroad Commission Texas Et Al. v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Railroad Commission Texas Et Al. v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.
60 S. CT. 1021, 310 U.S. 573, 84 L. ED. 1368, 1940.SCT.40700
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Descripción editorial
The question before us is the validity, when challenged by appeal to the Fourteenth Amendment, of an oil proration order promulgated by the Railroad Commission of Texas, insofar as it applies to the respondents wells.