Raphael v. Bloomfield Raphael v. Bloomfield

Raphael v. Bloomfield

113 CAL.APP.4TH 617, 6 CAL.RPTR.3D 583, 68 CAL. COMP. CASES 1680, 3 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 10,109, 2003.CA.0010822

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

After the Employment Development Department (the EDD) paid temporary unemployment compensation disability (UCD) benefits to a disabled worker, it filed a lien claim for reimbursement from the employers insolvent workers compensation carrier. California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) assumed the insolvent carriers obligations, but refused to satisfy the EDDs lien. CIGA argued it is only required to pay a "covered claim" and the EDDs lien is an obligation to a state that is excluded from the definition of "covered claims." (Ins. Code, § 1063.1, subd. (c)(4).) The Workers Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) ruled against CIGA, reasoning that reimbursement of the EDDs lien is a payment to the particular disabled workers account, not to the EDD.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
November 21
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
18
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
66.5
KB
Datig v. Dove Books Inc. Datig v. Dove Books Inc.
1999
Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County Planned Parenthood Golden Gate v. Superior Court of San Mateo County
2000
Frase v. Gourley Frase v. Gourley
2000
Department Of Children And Family Services Department Of Children And Family Services
2002
Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors
2001
Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction Sully-Miller Contracting Company v. Gledson/Cashman Construction
2002