Richard W. Campbell and Harold T. Collins v. Gladys B. Campbell
FL.42751; 489 So. 2d 774; 11 Fla. Law W. 1000 (1986)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge. The guardian ad litem's motion for rehearing1{/Cite} claims that our determination that extrinsic evidence is admissible in the case of a so-called patent ambiguity in a will, and is not confined to resolving a latent ambiguity, is totally at variance with the settled law of Florida. We disagree.
More Books by Third District. District Court of Appeal of Florida
Meyer Kotler And Helen G. Rechtschaffer v. Morris Kroop
1978
For Adults Only v. State Florida Ex Rel. Richard E. Gerstein
1972
James Clyde Kish and Leevy Carlton Mears v. State Florida
1966
Haskell Liberman and Leatrice Liberman v. Paul Rhyne
1971
National Trading v. Cat Cay
1963
Publix Super Markets v. Bessie Lindholm
1971