Russell Wickstrom v. North Idaho College

This proceeding arises from the trial courts grant of respondents motion for summary judgment on grounds that appellants claims against North Idaho College and one of its instructors, Charles D. Chastain, were tort claims barred by applicable provisions of the Idaho Tort Claims Act. We are called upon to decide whether, as found by the trial court, appellants claims lay in tort and were, consequently, barred by provisions of the Idaho Tort Claims Act, or whether such claims also state a possible cause of action in contract.