Santo Trafficante v. State Florida
1957.FL.40035; 92 SO. 2D 811
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
They first contend that the trial court erred in permitting the State Attorney directly or indirectly to comment upon the fact that appellants failed to take the witness stand and testify in their own behalf. The basis for this contention is found in certain remarks made by the State Attorney in his final argument to the jury, which remarks were in part as follows:
More Books by En Banc. Supreme Court of Florida
United Hardware-Furniture Company v. K. A. Blue
1910
Jack F. White v. James D. Bourne and Erle B. Askew
1942
Petition Florida State Bar Association for Promulgation New Florida Rules Civil Procedure
1940
J. Walker Pope and Richard D. Pope
1925
Hinton Folsom as Tax Collector Jackson County
1929
William D. Hopkins v. George H. Baldwin
1936