Scarborough v. Central Arizona Light And Power Co. Scarborough v. Central Arizona Light And Power Co.

Scarborough v. Central Arizona Light And Power Co‪.‬

117 P.2d 487, 58 Ariz. 51, 1941.AZ.40056

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

LOCKWOOD, C.J. Pauline Scarborough, called plaintiff, and D. C. Scarborough, her husband, brought suit against Central Arizona Light and Power Company, a corporation, called defendant, and John Doe, to recover damages which plaintiff alleged she had incurred through the negligence of defendant. The case came on for trial before a jury, and after plaintiff had made her opening statement, defendant moved that the jury be instructed to return a verdict for it on the ground that the opening statement of counsel did not show facts sufficient to sustain a verdict against defendant. The court took a recess, and after discussing with counsel the issues of the case, counsel for plaintiff made a specific and detailed avowal of what he expected to prove, whereupon the court granted the motion of defendant, and instructed the jury to return a verdict in its favor, which was done, and in due course this appeal was taken.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1941
October 6
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
66.6
KB

More Books by Arizona Supreme Court

State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Schwab State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Schwab
1963
State v. Miranda State v. Miranda
1973
In Re One 1965 Ford Mustang In Re One 1965 Ford Mustang
1970
Modern Woodmen of America v. Stevens Modern Woodmen of America v. Stevens
1950
Miranda V. State Miranda V. State
1933
City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
1980