Scarborough V. Principi Scarborough V. Principi

Scarborough V. Principi

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA or Act) departs from the general rule that each party to a lawsuit pays his or her own legal fees. See Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U. S. 240, 257 (1975). Relevant here, EAJA authorizes the payment of fees to a prevailing party in an action against the United States; the Government may defeat this entitlement by showing that its position in the underlying litigation "was substantially justified." 28 U. S. C. §2412(d)(1)(A). In a further provision, §2412(d)(1)(B), the Act prescribes the timing and content of applications seeking fees authorized by §2412(d)(1)(A). Section 2412(d)(1)(B) specifies as the time for filing the application "within thirty days of final judgment in the action." In the same sentence, the provision identifies the application's contents, in particular, a showing that the applicant is a "prevailing party" who meets the financial eligibility condition (in this case, a net worth that "did not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the ... action was filed," §2412(d)(2)(B)); and a statement of the amount sought, with an accompanying itemization. The fee application instruction adds in the next sentence: "The [applicant] shall also allege that the position of the United States was not substantially justified."

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2004
May 3
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
38
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
81.2
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of the United States

Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona
1966
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Federal Rules of Evidence, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2024 Federal Rules of Evidence, Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure and Appellate Procedure 2024
2024
Terry v. Ohio Terry v. Ohio
1968
Mapp v. Ohio Mapp v. Ohio
1961