Should Landowners Receive Just Compensation for Coastal Wetlands Regulations? (Features).
Appraisal Journal 2003, April, 71, 2
-
- $5.99
-
- $5.99
Publisher Description
abstract This article discusses issues in the case of Polazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606 (2001), which was decided by the United States Supreme Court in June 2001. Anthony Palazzolo owned approximately 18 acres of coastal wetlands that he wanted to fill in order to build a residential subdivision. Regulators would not allow him to fill the wetlands and the ensuing litigation involved several aspects of regulatory taking law and ripeness doctrine. The Supreme Court opinion also raises important valuation issues.
More Books Like This
Takings and Judicial Deference: Takings Law After the 2004-05 Supreme Court Term (Law and the Appraiser)
2005
Have Redevelopment Agencies Gone Too Far Using the Power of Eminent Domain? the Supreme Court May Soon Tell US (Kelo V. City of New London, And Relevant Case History)
2004
Eminent Domain After Kelo: The Battle Continues.
2006
Kelo V. The City of New London: What Does It Really Mean?
2005
On Discounted Partnership Interests and Adequate Consideration.
2009
The Perils of Bright Lines: Section 6110(K) (3) and the Ambiguous Precedential Status of Written Determinations.
2005
More Books by Appraisal Journal
The Importance of Market Analysis in the Valuation of Self-Storage Facilities (Features)
2003
Cross-Examination at a Jury Trial. (Features).
2003
Ground Leases: Rent Reset Valuation Issues.
2011
Subdivision Development: Risk, Profit, And Developer Surveys.
2004
Zillow's Estimates of Single-Family Housing Values.
2010
Where the Overall Cap Rate Meets the Discount Rate (Property Valuation)
2004