Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld

Southwest Auto Painting And Body Repair Inc. V. Binsfeld

    • 5.0 • 2 Ratings
    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

This appeal is from summary judgment entered in favor of defendants. In granting summary judgment, the trial court held that, as a matter of law, an insurance agent does not owe a client or customer any duty to recommend or advise of the need for any specific insurance coverage. We hold that an agent owes a duty to a client or customer to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in procuring insurance and that questions of the applicable standard of care and whether the agent breached his duty by failing to recommend specific coverage present questions for the trier of fact.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1995
May 23
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
71.6
KB

More Books by Arizona Court of Appeals

Timmerman v. U.S. Bank Timmerman v. U.S. Bank
2007
Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency Morley v. Central Intelligence Agency
2007
Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission Trudeau v. Federal Trade Commission
2006
M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc. M & M Auto Storage Pool Inc. V. Chemical Waste Management Inc.
1990
Bell V. State Bell V. State
1984
Kadera V. Superior Court Kadera V. Superior Court
1996