Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company

Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company

36 S. Ct. 278, 240 U.S. 103, 60 L. Ed. 546, SCT.40110(1916)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court. As in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R., ante, p. 1, this case was commenced by the appellant as a stockholder of the Baltic Mining Company, the appellee, to enjoin the voluntary payment by the corporation and its officers of the tax assessed against it under the Income Tax section of the Tariff Act of October 3, 1913, c. 16, ? 2, 38 Stat. 166, 181. As the grounds for the equitable relief sought in this case so far as the question of jurisdiction is concerned are substantially the same as those which were relied upon in the Brushaber Case, it follows that the ruling in that case upholding the power to dispose of that controversy is controlling here and we put that subject out of view.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1916
February 21
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
14
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
67.6
KB
Roe Et Al. v. Wade Roe Et Al. v. Wade
1973
Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy v. Ferguson.
1896
Miranda v. Arizona Miranda v. Arizona
1966
Terry v. Ohio Terry v. Ohio
1968
Mapp v. Ohio Mapp v. Ohio
1961
Korematsu v. United States Korematsu v. United States
1944